He was probably in his mid-50s, a perfectly ordinary looking sort, but he was getting a private swim lesson in the 1/2 hour before my daughter and her friend Sylvie had their lesson. And he was terrified. Allie, the instructor, had him in the twelve-foot section of the pool with two noodles supporting him, and he clutched the wall for all he was worth. He could chat about it — not quite the same as a scared child — but it was easy to see that he was really frightened.
I spoke with him during Olivia’s lesson & he said that when he was a kid someone had thrown him in the water (to “teach him to swim”) and he’d never gotten over the panic. This summer was the first time he’d tried lessons in his life. A very brave man.
Makes me rethink some stuff about the water – human relationship that I’ve been working on. Swimming is nearly universal now — I wonder what the statistics are, in the US and worldwide — but it hasn’t always been, at least not everywhere. I think the Polynesians have always been great swimmers, but in the 17c it was an exotic practice in England, even banned at Cambridge along with other Continental (ie, Italian) bad habits. The water looks quite different if you can’t swim.
steven.williams06 says
Wow. Good for him. Being a Long Islander who’s grown up half an hour from the beach and had a pool all his life, it’s easy for me to take swimming for granted. I’m not a strong swimmer, but I know how to stay afloat, and I can’t imagine what the water looks like to a non-swimmer. I wonder how someone who grew up swimming in pools and has never been to the beach–someone from, say, Ohio–might view the ocean. Again, going to the beach all my life, I can’t imagine, but a first-time beach goer must be more conscious of the ocean’s power (and danger) than anybody. How otherworldly must something so forceful, tremendous beautiful seem to fresh eyes?
Was swimming banned in Cambridge for the sole reason that it was considered an “Italian bad habit?” or were there other reasons?
stevementz says
I don’t know why swimming was banned in Cambridge. There was some controversy around the publication of a Latin treatise, *De arte natandi*, translated into English as “The Art of Swimming*. It’s hard to imagine that the ban was very effective, but I also don’t think there was much recreational swimming in the 16c.